[Magdalen] EC v. ED of Ft. Worth

[Charles Wohlers]

I believe it means they refused to hear the case, meaning the lower court 
ruling stands.

Chad Wohlers
about to head back North from sunny Florida,
Woodbury, VT USA
chadwohl at satucket.com


-----Original Message----- 
From: Grace Cangialosi
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 10:18 AM
To: magdalen at herberthouse.org
Subject: Re: [Magdalen] EC v. ED of Ft. Worth

I'm sorry, but I don't know what this means.

> On Nov 3, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Roy Murphy <roy.murphy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Cert denied. :(
>
>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Ginga Wilder <gingawilder at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> OK.  It's 9:30 am.  What's the story....yes, that is a ridiculous 
>> inquiry.
>> But, members of TECSC are among those waiting on this decision. If USSC
>> takes the case and iff USSC decides on behalf of TEC, this will have
>> enormous impact on the South Carolina case.  I don't much care about 
>> parish
>> real property issues, but I do indeed want our name, our symbols, our 
>> trust
>> fund, our camp and conference center, our diocesan property ETC returned 
>> to
>> Episcpalians.  Others in TECSC sincerely are invested in having the 
>> parish
>> properties.
>>
>> SC awaits the decision of Circuit Court Judge Diane Goodstein in the
>> lawsuit where Bp Lawrence and his breakaway church is suing TEC and 
>> TECSC.
>>
>> Ginga
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Roy Murphy <roy.murphy at gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Did I say 11/1? Tomorrow at 9:30. My guess is that it gets relisted for
>>> another conference. That has been their recent practice.
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Roy Murphy <roy.murphy at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Supreme Court docket says the case was distributed for the 10/31
>>>> conference. We could hear further news on 11/1. Either grant, deny or
>>>> relist.
>>