[Magdalen] hellooooooo

[Sally Davies]

I would say that is a fair assessment, Jim! There are many more still
subscribed as members, and some who "lurk" as well as a few infrequent
posters - and some of the addresses on our system may be moribund, not
picked up as a failed send but also not read by anyone.

But since the advent of Facebook as a thing that older people do, we're a
much smaller active company than we used to be, and definitely a more
peaceable one. I was just thinking, earlier this week, that not once in the
past two years since we moved from Cape Town to PE, have I needed to worry
about a tetchy relationship on the List. Life as a Publican has become very
lazy which is just as well considering I'm working pretty much full time
these days.

Sally D

On Saturday, 18 October 2014, James Oppenheimer <oppenheimerjw at gmail.com>
wrote:

> How many actual subscribers are there on this list?
> I think almost all the posts come from about ten or so names. That could
> account for the ups and downs. If you have ten people who actually read the
> thing and five of them go to the loo, that pretty much does in the list.
>
> Just a cheery thought.
>
> James W. Oppenheimer
> *"If you have a chance to accomplish something that will make things better
> for people coming behind you, and you don't do it, you're wasting your time
> on this Earth."  -- *Roberto Clemente
>