[Magdalen] EC v. ED of Ft. Worth

[Roy Murphy]

The title of the case is odd from our point of view. It is TEC v. Jack Iker
et al. I believe the titling of the case was changed by the Iker faction in
the appeals process.
On Oct 20, 2014 11:09 PM, "Grace Cangialosi" <gracecan at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm still confused. You said the conservatives 'left, wanting to take
> everything' and the Supreme Court of Texas gave it back to them.
> So, in other words, they got to take everything?
>
> Why is the Episcopal Church suing the Episcopal Diocese? Aren't they on
> the same side? I would think the Episcopal Church or Diocese would be suing
> the breakaway folks...
>
>
>
> > On Oct 20, 2014, at 6:00 PM, "Lynn Ronkainen" <ichthys89 at comcast.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > The conservatives 'left' wanting to 'take everything'.... the SCourt of
> TX gave it back to them... it's still not settled as you can see.  The TX
> SCourt still fancies that TX is a Republic, IMNSHO...
> >
> > Lynn
> >
> > website: www.ichthysdesigns.com
> >
> > When I stand before God at the end of my life I would hope that I have
> not a single bit of talent left and could say, "I used everything You gave
> me." attributed to Erma Bombeck
> >
> > Thomas Merton writes, "People may spend their whole lives climbing the
> ladder of success only to find, once they reach the top, that the ladder is
> leaning against the wrong wall."
> >
> > "What you seek is seeking you." - Rumi
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Grace Cangialosi" <gracecan at gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 4:54 PM
> > To: <magdalen at herberthouse.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Magdalen] EC v. ED of Ft. Worth
> >
> >> So is this Episcopal Church vs. Episcopal Diocese? Which group are the
> good guys?
> >>
> >>> On Oct 20, 2014, at 5:26 PM, Roy Murphy <roy.murphy at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The Episcopal church won in the state district court and the appeals
> court
> >>> but the TX Supreme Court ruled in favor of the former bishop of Ft.
> Worth.
> >>> TEC appealed to SCOTUS. The brief is not a bad argument. It has already
> >>> gotten a few amicus curae briefs in support.
> >>>
> >>> SCOTUS hasn't yet decided whether to grant cert on the case. The
> justices
> >>> will discuss it on 12/31 and decide whether to hear the case, deny the
> >>> request they hear it or hold it over for another conference.
> >>>> On Oct 20, 2014 12:26 PM, "Jay Weigel" <jay.weigel at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Huh? Details, please.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Roy Murphy <roy.murphy at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Supreme Court docket says the case was distributed for the 10/31
> >>>>> conference. We could hear further news on 11/1. Either grant, deny or
> >>>>> relist.
>