[Magdalen] 2nd priest in SC returns to The Episcopal Church

[Ginga Wilder]

Christopher, as I understand it, all Epicopal clergy who were canonically
resident in SC were given a chance to remain so.  This would include any
non-parochial priests.  Both priests who have returned were in parishes
when the split happened.

Ginga



On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Christopher Hart <cervus51 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm not in the know about the South Carolina situation, but surely there
> must have been some clergy involved who were assistants or non-parochial,
> not just rectors.
>
> On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Jim Guthrie <jguthrie at pipeline.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > From: Ginga Wilder
> >
> >  And, nope.  This is not about property.  TEC and TECSC have just
> appealed
> >> the SC Circuit Court decision on behalf of the Lawrence Church.  You may
> >> read that announcement here:
> >>
> >
> > http://www.episcopalchurchsc.org/news-release-march-24-2015.html
> >
> > If it's not about property, why spend money on an appeal?
> >
> > I've spent a lot of time and years on vestries and vestry committees --
> > and I can't believe that even on parish in SC followed Lawrence out of
> TEC
> > (the real one) without the Rector leading the charge. But are you saying
> if
> > these clergy come back, it's only on their own and they suddenly no
> longer
> > have any influence over its congregation and vestry?
> >
> > Now if you said the two clergy members who've come back were disconnected
> > from their parishes (or any parish) that might be worth noting. Is that
> the
> > case?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jim Guthrie
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Christopher Hart
>
> List Mail Address: cervus51 at gmail.com
> Personal Mail: cervus at veritasliberat.net
> Twitter: @cervus51
>