[Magdalen] TECnical question
Scott Knitter
scottknitter at gmail.com
Tue May 5 11:31:45 UTC 2015
I tend to do as Roger does because I don't like the abbreviation.
Sent from my iPad
> On May 4, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Lynn Ronkainen <houstonklr at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Roger> From outside the US when I see TEC I mentally vocalise it as a word
>> rather than a series of letters.
>
> Nope, it is said: T E C
>
> Lynn
>
> My email has changed to: houstonKLR at gmail.com
>
> website: www.ichthysdesigns.com
>
> When I stand before God at the end of my life I would hope that I have not a single bit of talent left and could say, "I used everything You gave me." attributed to Erma Bombeck
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Roger Stokes" <roger.stokes65 at btinternet.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 6:17 PM
> To: <magdalen at herberthouse.org>
> Subject: Re: [Magdalen] TECnical question
>
>>> On 04/05/2015 23:52, Lynn Ronkainen wrote:
>>> David Strang> But to the point - I tend to put the stress on the last syllable of words
>>>> of acronyms such as TV = television and TVA = Tennessee Valley
>>>> Authority, etc. He routinely stresses the first syllable.
>>>
>>> have no idea...
>>>
>>> pondering whether TV is a true acronym as it is a shortening of a word, not a stand in for two words...
>>>
>>> It is interesting that some acronyms are said as a 'word' while others, TEC included, are 'spelled'. Some are both - NASA for instance. Wonder if there are any *rules* that govern this? I'm thinking not.
>>
>> From outside the US when I see TEC I mentally vocalise it as a word rather than a series of letters.
>>
>> Roger
>
More information about the Magdalen
mailing list