[Magdalen] TECnical question

Scott Knitter scottknitter at gmail.com
Tue May 5 11:31:45 UTC 2015


I tend to do as Roger does because I don't like the abbreviation.

Sent from my iPad

> On May 4, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Lynn Ronkainen <houstonklr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Roger> From outside the US when I see TEC I mentally vocalise it as a word
>> rather than a series of letters.
> 
> Nope, it is said: T E C
> 
> Lynn
> 
> My email has changed to: houstonKLR at gmail.com
> 
> website: www.ichthysdesigns.com
> 
> When I stand before God at the end of my life I would hope that I have not a single bit of talent left and could say, "I used everything You gave me." attributed to Erma Bombeck
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Roger Stokes" <roger.stokes65 at btinternet.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 6:17 PM
> To: <magdalen at herberthouse.org>
> Subject: Re: [Magdalen] TECnical question
> 
>>> On 04/05/2015 23:52, Lynn Ronkainen wrote:
>>> David Strang> But to the point - I tend to put the stress on the last syllable of  words
>>>> of acronyms such as TV = television and TVA = Tennessee Valley
>>>> Authority, etc.  He routinely stresses the first syllable.
>>> 
>>> have no idea...
>>> 
>>> pondering whether TV is a true acronym as it is a shortening of a word, not a stand in for two words...
>>> 
>>> It is interesting that some acronyms are said as a 'word'  while others, TEC included, are 'spelled'. Some are both - NASA for instance. Wonder if there are any *rules* that govern this?  I'm thinking not.
>> 
>> From outside the US when I see TEC I mentally vocalise it as a word rather than a series of letters.
>> 
>> Roger 
> 


More information about the Magdalen mailing list