[Magdalen] R.I.P. Justice Scalia

[Eleanor Braun]

Why hasn't he been included in the GOP debates?

Eleanor

On Sunday, February 14, 2016, Susan Hagen <susanvhagen at gmail.com> wrote:

> In that vein, there is still a movement for Cthulhu with their slogan,
> Why settle for the lesser evil?
>
> https://cthulhuforamerica.com/
>
> Susan
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Lynn Ronkainen <houstonklr at gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Grace> I think Bush and Kasich would probably do the least damage ...
> >
> >
> > It is so sad that we actually think in these terms about our country's
> > leaders.  And I might use those words too.
> >
> > Lynn
> >
> > website: www.ichthysdesigns.com
> >
> > When I stand before God at the end of my life I would hope that I have
> not a
> > single bit of talent left and could say, "I used everything You gave me."
> > attributed to Erma Bombeck
> > "Either Freedom for all or stop talking about Freedom at all" from a
> talk by
> > Richard Rohr
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Grace Cangialosi" <gracecan at gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 7:41 PM
> > To: "Magdalen" <magdalen at herberthouse.org <javascript:;>>
> > Subject: Re: [Magdalen] R.I.P. Justice Scalia
> >
> >> I agree that it would be great to have Obama on the Supreme Court, but
> >> maybe in 5-10 years. And I wish I were as sure as you are that the Dems
> will
> >> retain the White House. Everything is so absolutely crazy about this
> >> election that I'm not sure of anything. I mean, who would ever have
> believed
> >> that anyone would take Trump seriously at all...and that they're STILL
> doing
> >> it?!  I think Hilary will probably be the Democratic candidate, and
> she's
> >> clearly the best qualified, but a lot of people really don't like her
> and
> >> will vote for anyone else. It also seems that many folks don't care
> about
> >> qualifications at all--they're just attracted by anger and bigotry and
> who
> >> can yell the loudest and appeal to their worst fears. How else do you
> >> explain Trump and Cruz? I think Bush and Kasich would probably do the
> least
> >> damage as a Republican president, but I'm not sure either of them can
> get
> >> the nomination.
> >> And that's the last political post I'm going to make until we have the
> VA
> >> primary, which I think is March 1st.
> >>
> >> On February 13, 2016, at 7:50 PM, Molly Wolf <lupa at kos.net
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >> My thought exactly.  I believe the Dems will take the White House.  It
> >> would be well to focus on Congressional elections in 2016, with the aim
> of
> >> restoring sanity to the Republican Party by knocking it cross eyed. Get
> the
> >> veterans on side with the Dems and go for high voter turnout among black
> >> voters and the young.  Then a good Supreme Court nominee  could pass
> without
> >> the sort of c**p that this Congress has been indulging in. (I'd love to
> see
> >> Obama on the SCUSA but the poor man needs a break!)
> >>
> >> Molly
> >>
> >> The man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in
> no
> >> other way. -- Mark Twain
> >>
> >>> On Feb 13, 2016, at 6:44 PM, ME Michaud <michaudme at gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If the current Congress blocks a nominee,
> >>> the NEXT president and the NEXT congress ...
> >>> get it?
> >>>
> >>> On Saturday, February 13, 2016, Roger Stokes
> >>> <roger.stokes65 at btinternet.com <javascript:;>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> On 13/02/2016 23:35, ME Michaud wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They would be wise not to procrastinate.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bill Clinton would be great on the Supreme Court.
> >>>>> So would Barak Obama.
> >>>>> :-)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I understand that he has said he would decline such a nomination,
> though
> >>>> technically I assume he could nominate himself.
> >>>>
> >>>> Roger
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among
> you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the
> land of Egypt.
> Leviticus 19:34
>