[Magdalen] More USA Today.

[Lynn Ronkainen]

For me and Hil its trusting Hill herself. 
Lynn

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 6, 2016, at 5:16 PM, James Oppenheimer-Crawford <oppenheimerjw at gmail.com> wrote:

This is the thing which keeps popping up to cast obstacles in Hil's various
campaign efforts.  People may favor her positions, but they just can't
quite trust a woman.  It's a very irrational thing.  You can point it out
and they'll agree and then just go and vote down another good candidate
just because it's a female.

James W. Oppenheimer-Crawford
*“A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved,
except in memory. LLAP**”  -- *Leonard Nimoy

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Cantor03--- via Magdalen <
magdalen at herberthouse.org> wrote:

> 
> The front page of this national newspaper has an article that
> continues extensively inside about the extra difficulties women have
> in breaking through into the upper levels of politics, state and  national.
> 
> There is the somewhat unusual distrust that seems intrinsic to men
> but surprisingly to women, too.  A considerable block of voters,  men
> and women alike do not trust a woman politician.  This is a  difficult
> handicap for women to overcome who would aspire to these positions.
> 
> It strikes me as odd with the demonstration of the strong women
> leaders in Europe for some time.  Witness the "Iron Lady"  Margaret
> Thatcher in the UK and Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany and
> de facto Prime Minister of Europe.  Who can forget  Milwaukee-born
> Golda Meier who guided Israel through the Six Day War?
> 
> If "The Fatherland" can accept a woman leader, why not the USA?
> 
> 
> David Strang.
>