[Magdalen] OK...I'm done!

[Grace Cangialosi]

Yes, in fact, I'm listening at this very moment to a news account of this. I loved Hillary's question..."Who gets up at 3:00 in the morning to send out tweets..."
Of course, he responded that this would show people that if they needed him, he'd be there.

Scary...

> On Sep 30, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Jay Weigel <jay.weigel at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, Grace, the drug-or-something-fueled Twitter rampage the man went on
> last night. One has only to look at the timestamps to realize he was up all
> night. This can't be good.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Grace Cangialosi <gracecan at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> When did you write that last post, Jay, where you referred to "last
>> night"?  Something since the debate?
>> 
>>> On Sep 30, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Jay Weigel <jay.weigel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> You don't know WHAT or WHO he will blame in some drug-fueled rage. I
>> swear
>>> the man HAD to have been on something last night.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Grace Cangialosi <gracecan at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> No, he'll blame
>>>> The microphones
>>>> The voting machined
>>>> The rigged system
>>>> Hillary's emails that MUST have contained some nefarious scheme to steal
>>>> the election
>>>> His hairdresser
>>>> Etc., etc., ad nauseam.....
>>>> 
>>>> (I think that's the first time I've ever used 'nefarious' in a
>>>> sentence--hope it's correct!)
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 30, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Jay Weigel <jay.weigel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I suspect he'll blame her if/when he loses the election.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:00 PM, M J _Mike_ Logsdon <mjl at ix.netcom.com
>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> But, you see, because they are men it makes sense for them to blame
>>>> the
>>>>>> women for not being alluring enough to keep them - it’s all their
>> wives
>>>>>> faults, not theirs.<<<
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I guess Melania gets the job done well enough, then.
>>