[Magdalen] Interesting review, new New Testament translation
Lynn Ronkainen
houstonklr at gmail.com
Tue Dec 12 04:49:16 UTC 2017
>wouldn't read it if it messed with his theology
Sadly, can't have that happening.... : (
Lynn
website: www.ichthysdesigns.com
When I stand before God at the end of my life I would hope that I have not a
single bit of talent left and could say, "I used everything You gave me."
attributed to Erma Bombeck
"Mercy and compassion are more than personal options. They are the antidotes
to that fear and hatred." Mark Singel
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Grace Cangialosi" <gracecan at gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 9:41 PM
To: <magdalen at herberthouse.org>
Subject: Re: [Magdalen] Interesting review, new New Testament translation
> A few years ago I read “God’s Secretaries,” a fascinating history of the
> writing of the King James Bible. I suggested that my son might find it
> interesting, since he believes that’s the one true Bible. He said he
> wouldn’t read it if it messed with his theology.
> I do recommend it, though!
>
> On Dec 11, 2017, at 12:53 PM, M J _Mike_ Logsdon <mjl at ix.netcom.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>>> Interesting, because I’ve never heard the suggestion that NT is
>>>>> anything other than a collection—like the Hebrew Bible. What’s the
>>>>> alternative view—that someone sat down and wrote it all out?<<<
>>
>> Not just NT, but OT as well. The "Bible" (must be capped) is one book,
>> even though comprised of what they admit are called "books". Anyway, to
>> your question...
>>
>> In the grouping of people that call themselves Christians that also do
>> not admit there are any other legitimate "holy books" in existence other
>> than the Bible, there's basically three camps:
>>
>> 1) those that believe that, yes, Someone sat down (not hard, as He's
>> sitting on a throne to begin with) and "wrote it all out" by literally
>> guiding the "writers'" hands as if by automatic writing;
>> 2) those that believe that each "writer" was genuinely and individually
>> inspired to write what was written, but still guided by the Holy Spurt
>> (pace Erma Bombeck) to the extent that they were still "following
>> orders", as it were, in helping (albeit unwittingly) to prepare The Holy
>> Bible, the author of which is God; and
>> 3) those that in spite of their blinkered version of Christianity
>> nonetheless have done some reading in the realm of how the Bible actually
>> came to be, but still believe in at least some form of direct divine
>> inspiration (which latter isn't all too bad, I suppose).
>>
>> A rare few of those populating category 3 have actually heard and/or read
>> about Jerome and his work in gathering what more or less came to be the
>> western canon.
>>
>> M J (Mike) Logsdon.
>>
>> "Aaugh[.]" -- Charles Brown.
>> "Avoid dull needles and use a soft cloth." -- E Kovacs.
More information about the Magdalen
mailing list