[Magdalen] Republicans push for a permanent aristocracy - The Washington ...
Jim Guthrie
jguthrie at pipeline.com
Sat Apr 18 15:45:09 UTC 2015
Some people might posit the notion that the budding aristocratic elites are folk
who still have (the ever-vanishing) defined benefit pension,
contribution/deductible/co-pay-free plans and income high enough to salt away
savings for retirement. And get tax breaks for everything from local taxes to
home interest deductions (gotta be rich enough to afford a home for those) --
not to mention a host of other tax deals only available to the
elites/aristocracy through America's Hidden "Welfare for the Moneyed" system.
And of course, there are the private enterprise subsidies -- someone rich enough
to own an estate in three acre zoning territory pays the same KWH, cable fees
and telephone as a low-income person living in a high rise, even though the
utilities charge off billions to subsidize those power lines and cable lines and
phone lines easily disrupted/destroyed in a storm, thus making sure low-income
people subsidize the rich (or middle class, for that matter), without a peep
from the crowd "concerned for the poor."
I think of the consternation in the Kerner Report (not) over the finding that
family breakdown in Watts was a major factor in the riots there back in the
1960s. And it turned out that one of the reasons for family breakdowns was that
after the abandonment of the Pacific Electric in 1961 (LAMTA by then) -- a 30
minute trip to downtown jobs (most Watts people were employed) had turned into
a family-wrenching two hour bus ride each way.
Well, what's the use of being in the aristocracy if you can’t say, "Let them eat
cake."
Of course, that describes folk who think themselves merely "middle class" or
even "poor" at an income level higher than most of the world's population.
The GOP version of it is merely the American Dream (or perhaps nightmare for
those at the bottom).
Maybe we need to resuscitate "Poor people tourism" like Eleanor taking Franklin
Roosevelt to visit to the Rivington Settlement House and nearby tenements. "I
never realized people lived like that," said the future President.
I realize "Poor People Tourism" long ago became frowned upon in some circles as
demeaning to the poor.
One might ask, "How has that worked out?"
Cheers,
Jim
More information about the Magdalen
mailing list