[Magdalen] BSA

Jay Weigel jay.weigel at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 15:13:54 UTC 2015


It's JONI Ernst, and she gives me the shudders. The way the U.S. political
system is run, the chances for women to be leaders aren't really wonderful.
However there are some good ones on the Democratic side, which you failed
to mention. Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Duckworth, and Patty Murray come
immediately to mind. They probably all need just a bit more time in grade,
as do some of the real up-and-comers like Tulsi Gabbard and Mazie Hirono.
It'll be awhile before we get to where Norway or Iceland have been though.
Even India and Pakistan are ahead of us on this one.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Jim Guthrie <jguthrie at pipeline.com> wrote:

> On 29/07/2015 00:15, Grace Cangialosi wrote:
>
>  This is a fascinating thread. Can someone explain to me why we've never
>> had a woman president in the US, when there are so many countries that have
>> them  >(or prime ministers) or have had them, and nobody batted an eye?
>> What is it about our history and culture that has mitigated against that?
>>
>
> Judy Ernst for President? How about giving  Carly Fiorina a chance to do
> for the nation what she did for Compaq and HP?
>
> Keep in mind that women were not eligible during most  of America's
> history.
>
> How many women ever aspired to the smoke-filled rooms where candidates
> were pretty much chosen until the 1970s?  And how many women had successful
> Governorships, or became Senators other than through death of a Senator
> Husband (Margaret Chase Smith, Maureen Neuberger) and thus grained the
> perceived gravitas?  I realize there was a boomlet for a Smith campaign for
> the Presidency in 1964, but highly unlikely in the GOP  of Scranton,
> Rockefeller and Goldwater.
>
> Of course,women own  most of the wealth in the United States (and have
> since at least the 1950s --even a significant portion of the 1%)-- but
> there's no evidence that women care enough about that to try to make a
> difference in business.  Heck, the majority of women seem to take the
> Barbie approach and cede actual control of their wealth to men.
>
> Given that, why would anyone think there's long term influence in the
> modern money-driven political environment to really push for women leaders?
>
> Cheers,
> Jim
>
>
>
>


More information about the Magdalen mailing list