[Magdalen] Church vacancy

[Lynn Ronkainen]

ah.... from youa anatomical study background... that IS clarifying, David! 
: ) perhaps I missed that earlier in the thread as I was reading last, 
backwards.

so anatomists and grammarians both have their police : )
<gdr>
Lynn

website: www.ichthysdesigns.com

When I stand before God at the end of my life I would hope that I have not a 
single bit of talent left and could say, "I used everything You gave me." 
attributed to Erma Bombeck

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Cantor03--- via Magdalen" <magdalen at herberthouse.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 1:48 PM
To: <magdalen at herberthouse.org>
Cc: <Cantor03 at aol.com>
Subject: Re: [Magdalen] Church vacancy

>
>
> In a message dated 6/18/2015 2:29:07 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> houstonklr at gmail.com writes:
>
> but the  word palm alone does not signify 'of the hand' with out a
> qualifier
> and  the word palm(s) has more than one meaning in that spelling as well
> David,  so the word or phrase 'of his hands' clarifies the noun palm...
> just
> as  'hold them in his palm' might,  ... I'm sure the grammarians among us
> might weigh in with prepositional and declarative phrase  info...
>
> Lynn>>>>
>
> Uhhhhhh.
>
> I'm simply stating what is historically taught in courses in anatomy.
>
> I never recall describing a lesion as being on the palm of the hand.
> Instead, medically, the lesion is on the right or left palm.
>
> Since there are only two palms, how can "of the hand" clarify  anything?
>
>
> David Strang.
>
>
>
>