[Magdalen] Cane or Beet?
James Handsfield
jhandsfield at att.net
Tue Nov 24 15:38:21 UTC 2015
Sucrose is sucrose is sucrose. The coarseness has to do with the grinding process, not the source. IOW, there is no difference between cane and beet sugar.
-------------------------------------
Education is its own reward, both for the individual and for society.
Jim Handsfield
jhandsfield at att.net
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Cantor03--- via Magdalen <magdalen at herberthouse.org> wrote:
>
>
> I bought some store-brand granulated sugar recently. I used it on
> my hot Malto-meal (Upper Midwestern USA cereal) today where it was
> perfectly satisfactory.
>
> However, looking at the packaging, I noted there was nowhere any
> mention of "cane" being the origin of the product. I looked carefully
> at the pictures on the package, and realized that I had purchased
> beet sugar.
>
> The only difference I can see is that the beet sugar is a little more
> coarse. I've read, though, that some who bake a lot do not like
> beet sugar even though it is identical chemically, and is supposed to
> be interchangeable with cane sugar.
>
> The cooking shows I watch on PBS television never seem to broach the
> subject of cane vs. beet sugar.
>
> Any opinions here?
>
>
>
> David Strang.
More information about the Magdalen
mailing list