[Magdalen] Joe's potential entry.

[Lesley de Voil]

Not sure about your grammar  maven,but mine would have insisted that one use, "... , for whom would you have voted?"

Regards
Lesley de Voil
Who perhaps would have recast the whole sentence, such as, "In an election runoff tomorrow would you have  voted for  Bernie or Joe?" (How times have changed, where's the respect in calling them by such intimate names?)

-----Original Message-----
From: "Cantor03--- via Magdalen" <magdalen at herberthouse.org>
Sent: ‎21/‎09/‎2015 8:50
To: "magdalen at herberthouse.org" <magdalen at herberthouse.org>
Cc: "Cantor03 at aol.com" <Cantor03 at aol.com>
Subject: Re: [Magdalen] Joe's potential entry.



In a message dated 9/20/2015 3:18:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
mjl at ix.netcom.com writes:

1)   If the primary were today, who would you vote for?  Bernie.
2)   If Joe enters and the primary were held shortly after, who would you 
vote  for?  Bernie.
3)  If Joe enters and the primary is held at the  normal time, who would 
you vote for?   Bernie.>>>>>>>
 
I pretty much agree with you here, but, um......., it is "Whom would you  
vote
for"   :-)
 
Don't blame me; blame Lois Johnson.
 
David Strang......chatting earlier today with a fellow classmate of 
high school 1955 and recalling fondly our English/Latin teacher
for the entire four years, who was as strict a grammarian as  anywhere,
Mrs. Lois Johnson (what else in the Upper Midwest?).  Her middle
name might as well be "Objective Case."