[Magdalen] PB statement after investigation

[Grace Cangialosi]

That's what I thought, too, Scott, and if those kinds of issues were involved,  revealing details publicly might also compromise the privacy of any 'victims'.

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 5:43 PM, Scott Knitter <scottknitter at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think the nondisclosure of the nature of the offenses is what's
> opaque about the letter, but I understand this might be necessary.
> Since the issues are related to the work environment, I'm thinking
> some sort of harassment made it a toxic environment to work in, for
> one or several others. Could be sexual issues, anger issues, or a host
> of other things. Or not.
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Grace Cangialosi <gracecan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I had read his letter just before I saw your post, and I have to say I thought it was brilliant. I didn't find it opaque; rather, details of the misconduct of the two people terminated probably weren't spelled out in order to protect the privacy of others. And he distinguished between the nature of the findings regarding those two people and those regarding Sauls.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Scott R. Knitter
> Edgewater, Chicago, Illinois USA