[Magdalen] PB statement after investigation

[Scott Knitter]

I think the nondisclosure of the nature of the offenses is what's
opaque about the letter, but I understand this might be necessary.
Since the issues are related to the work environment, I'm thinking
some sort of harassment made it a toxic environment to work in, for
one or several others. Could be sexual issues, anger issues, or a host
of other things. Or not.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Grace Cangialosi <gracecan at gmail.com> wrote:
> I had read his letter just before I saw your post, and I have to say I thought it was brilliant. I didn't find it opaque; rather, details of the misconduct of the two people terminated probably weren't spelled out in order to protect the privacy of others. And he distinguished between the nature of the findings regarding those two people and those regarding Sauls.




-- 
Scott R. Knitter
Edgewater, Chicago, Illinois USA