[Magdalen] Election
Ann Markle
ann.markle at aya.yale.edu
Wed Feb 10 17:37:27 UTC 2016
This is not true. Hillary did get one less. And, as Eleanor pointed out,
this is the way the political system works. The pundits, which I enjoy
watching, have been saying for a long time that it's the delegates that
count, and that's what candidates need to pay attention to. That's part of
how Obama got it from Clinton in 2008. It pays to fact-check your sources,
Sib.
Ann
The Rev. Ann Markle
Buffalo, NY
ann.markle at aya.yale.edu
blog: www.onewildandpreciouslife.typepad.com
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Sibyl Smirl <polycarpa3 at ckt.net> wrote:
> On 2/10/16 8:04 AM, Lynn Ronkainen wrote:
>
>> ... Exit polls seem vindicated especially when the winner's margins are
>> large.
>>
>
> https://thehornnews.com/10982-2/
>
> Rigged! Hillary secretly STOLE New Hampshire
>
> February 10, 2016 59 Comments
>
> It’s the headline on every newspaper and website around the country:
> Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders won a resounding victory over former Secretary
> of State Hillary Clinton in yesterday’s New Hampshire Democratic primary.
>
> But there’s another story the media has been much slower to pick up on.
>
> Because despite his 22-point victory, Sanders didn’t walk away with the
> most New Hampshire delegates.
>
> Clinton did. And party insiders have been secretly working for months to
> rig the delegate count in Clinton’s favor, no matter what the voters of New
> Hampshire decided.
>
More information about the Magdalen
mailing list