[Magdalen] On and On it Goes.

[Jay Weigel]

The whole e-mail thing is a tempest in a teapot. Furthermore, the
government's computer system is woefully inadequate and probably on balance
WORSE than Hillary's private server, stuck somewhere around 2001 as it is.
And the other party didn't blink an eye about Karl Rove flushing 22,000
e-mails from Bush's White House server, so there you are. There is a large
and nasty "Get Hillary" crowd out there and it's only going to get worse.
If the GOP weren't stuck with a clown like Trump and in such total
disarray, Hillary would probably not be a factor in this election.

Jay, who really wants one of those "Obama in 2016--just to annoy you"
bumper stickers

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Grace Cangialosi <gracecan at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Could we bring back Bill Clinton?
>
> > On Jul 7, 2016, at 11:02 AM, Rick Mashburn <ricklmashburn at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Sally, you at definitely right about one thing: I'd vote for Obama in a
> > heartbeat (again) if he could run!!!
> >
> > Peace, Rick
> >> On Jul 7, 2016 9:20 AM, "Sally Davies" <sally.davies at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Not sure that everyone would agree with that David.
> >>
> >> The Donald looks, talks and acts like a caricature of the cheap, phony,
> >> fast-buck salesman with his foot in the door, and yet so many people
> still
> >> like him and vote for him anyway.
> >>
> >> Hillary (to me) looks Presidential and I believe she would make a good
> >> President for all sorts of reasons, but her carelessness might have put
> >> Service lives at risk and that's a serious problem, isn't it?
> >>
> >> What an abysmal choice - one candidate who's already failed to handle
> top
> >> secret material correctly, and another one whom no sane person should
> want
> >> anywhere near the "nuclear codes". Though I suppose one can at least
> argue
> >> that Hillary has (or should have) learned from her mistakes, whereas we
> >> probably can't imagine what kind of mistakes Trump would make if he were
> >> given any real power.
> >>
> >> For people outside the USA, like me, the absolute puzzle is why, out of
> >> hundreds of millions of people many of whom are fantastic leaders,
> thinkers
> >> and fighters for justice, HOW does "the system" end up with these two
> very
> >> flawed individuals?
> >>
> >> I'm thinking the same thing about the UK, watching that "snake in the
> >> grass" Michael Gove on TV and thinking - really - is THIS the best we
> can
> >> do? A pox on the lot of them...
> >>
> >> Not that I mean to compare Clinton and Trump as moral or intellectual
> >> equals because they absolutely are not. But still. If only Obama could
> stay
> >> on for another term!!
> >>
> >> Sadly shaking head
> >>
> >> Sally D
> >>
> >> On 7 July 2016 at 16:01, Cantor03--- via Magdalen <
> >> magdalen at herberthouse.org
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The USA Today, US nationally distributed newspaper has a front
> >>> page detailed examination of Donald Trump's dealings over the
> >>> years with the Atlantic City, New Jersey casino business.
> >>> This study paints those relationships as what can only be described
> >>> as sordid.
> >>>
> >>> In addition to his checkered dealings with his employees, there  is
> >>> a history of discrimination (women and blacks), and, of course, his
> >>> failure to pay for goods and services for the casinos.  The  final
> >>> multiples bankruptcies of his casinos put the final nails in the
> coffin.
> >>>
> >>> Also chronicled are his endless disputes with the New Jersey
> authorities
> >>> over the legality (or better, illegality) of Trump's casino  maneuvers.
> >>>
> >>> I suppose I'm biased, but the sweeping negative reports in both the
> >>> New York Times and in USA Today, make Hilary's email "scandals"
> >>> pale in comparison.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> David S.
> >>
>