[Magdalen] Marriage equality ACTUALLY PASSES first reading

[Kristin Rollins]

There was a later statement from the General Secretary that I received
by email this afternoon that indicates that he was not coded as laity,
but that the list his office had provided to the electronic voting
company listed him as "clergy, non-voting." (I am not sure why he was in
the system at all, if they had him as non-voting, though perhaps they
thought he needed to be able to see the results or something like that.)

Kristin

-- 
  Kristin Rollins
  kristin at verumsolum.com
  Portsmouth, VA

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016, at 02:51 PM, Marion Thompson wrote:
> Not quite Chicago, I'm glad to say.  It was human error that the record 
> of the General Secretary, who sits at the head table, was coded Laity 
> rather than Clergy which he certainly is.  Because another member had 
> filed a motion the previous day asking that the names attached to the 
> clicker results be made known to allow checking, when apparently 
> non-clicker-registered clergy votes were claimed yesterday, that was 
> already in place and the misclassification came to light and made the 
> difference.
> 
> However, the foolproof-ness of the clickers at this time is no longer 
> felt by the masses to be 100% for a variety of reasons. What will happen 
> at the episcopal elections on Sept. 17?  The eight candidates in the 
> room yesterday are certainly concerned!
> 
> Marion, a pilgrim
> 
> 
> On 7/12/2016 5:22 PM, Mahoney, W. Michael wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Ginga Wilder <gingawilder at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> WOW!  Intervention from on high?
> >>
> >> Seriously, Thanks be to God and careful counting.
> >>
> > Hmmmmm.  A bit of old Chicago up there in the North?
> >
> > Mike M, who remembers Mayor Richard Daley "finding" more votes the night of
> > the Kennedy/Nixon election .....
> >
>