[Magdalen] Dem convention

[Ginga Wilder]

I spent the better part of Saturday reading online The Atantic Magazine's
"The Mind of Donald Trump" (June 2016).  Chilling.  Straight forward.  I
pray this man will not be elected president.  (For those on this list who
think it wrong to publish such an article or to point it out for others to
read, I apologize.  I believe this clearly done case study merits sharing
widely.)

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/the-mind-of-donald-trump/480771/

I pray this man will not be elected president.

Ducking and running.  Unsubbing, if necessary.

Ginga Wilder


On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Jay Weigel <jay.weigel at gmail.com> wrote:

> That, Ferdinand, would be Tim Kaine's job, which I thought he did quite
> well last night <g> "Believe me"--oh yeah!
> And of course, that of the surrogates. Michael Bloomberg gave Trump very
> elegant "nanny nanny boo boo", I thought. Not, of course, that the Donald
> would get it, the words being too long for him.
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:17 PM, F von Prondzynski <
> F.von-Prondzynski at rgu.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > Scott wrote:
> >
> > > As for the presidential race, I really hope Hillary Clinton's campaign
> > > can (and wants to) take the role of the one who's serious about the
> > > issues and talks mostly about them, rather than attacking her
> > > opponent, however attackable he may be. I'm sure there's a certain
> > > need to answer attacks from him, but attacking shouldn't be the
> > > default mode in her advertising (and need not be, IMO).
> >
> > I guess I don’t have a dog in this race (though we’re all going to be
> > affected), but I know Hillary and want her to win – and agree with Scott
> in
> > relation to his key point. However, while I absolutely think Hillary
> should
> > be optimistic and focus on the issues, *someone* needs to point out the
> > absurdities of Trump’s platform, and the almost immeasurable dangers we
> > would face were he to win. This, as Obama said yesterday, is not an
> > ordinary election.
> >
> > We don’t need to mention his hair however. Or not much.
> >
> > Ferdinand
> >
> >
> >
>