[Magdalen] Cruz on Trump

[James Oppenheimer-Crawford]

Ralph Nader tested that third party hypothesis and the result was not what
the turned voters would have wanted.

Without some real advance work and credibility, a third party candidate is
not credible. Shouldn't be like that? Oh, I agree. But it IS like that.  It
is what it is. Wishing it to be something else will not change what is.

James W. Oppenheimer-Crawford
*“A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved,
except in memory. LLAP**”  -- *Leonard Nimoy

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Sibyl Smirl <polycarpa3 at ckt.net> wrote:

> On 9/25/16 2:53 AM, Allan Carr wrote:
>
>> Yesterday, Cruz endorsed Trump for President. Today, he refused to state
>> that Trump was fit to be President, only stating that there were two
>> choices for President.
>>
>> By this I assume he feels both choices are unfit, but Trump is less unfit
>> than Hillary.
>>
>> Once again jumping in hot water, I'll confess that I actually understand
>> him, except in reverse.
>>
>
> And me, I do point out that there are more than two choices for President
> on the ballot.  Maybe if all Americans who didn't want either one took a
> third or fourth or nth choice for their vote, there is a faint possibility
> that we might get a weak President who would be unable to get truly
> obnoxious ideas through Congress, and would have a stronger Congress.  It
> could get us four years of breathing space, no matter which things are the
> ones we individually want to _not_ get.
>
>
> --
> Sibyl Smirl
> I will take no bull from your house!  Psalms 50:9a
> mailto:polycarpa3 at ckt.net
>