[Magdalen] Cruz on Trump

[Roger Stokes]

On 25/09/2016 19:38, Sibyl Smirl wrote:
> On 9/25/16 2:53 AM, Allan Carr wrote:
>> Yesterday, Cruz endorsed Trump for President. Today, he refused to 
>> state that Trump was fit to be President, only stating that there 
>> were two choices for President.
>>
>> By this I assume he feels both choices are unfit, but Trump is less 
>> unfit than Hillary.
>>
>> Once again jumping in hot water, I'll confess that I actually 
>> understand him, except in reverse.
>
> And me, I do point out that there are more than two choices for 
> President on the ballot.  Maybe if all Americans who didn't want 
> either one took a third or fourth or nth choice for their vote, there 
> is a faint possibility that we might get a weak President who would be 
> unable to get truly obnoxious ideas through Congress, and would have a 
> stronger Congress.  It could get us four years of breathing space, no 
> matter which things are the ones we individually want to _not_ get.
>

I thought that the current President has great difficulty getting things 
through Congres and the whole system is in stalemate.  It would help if 
Congree did its proper jon of looking at what (and who) the President 
proposes and having a reasoned debates on the merits of the proposal.

Roger