[Magdalen] Let us work together -- uh huh

[Jay Weigel]

I have been suspecting for some time, particularly since the debates, that
he is on drugs--either using, which would be bad enough (I thought very
possibly cocaine or amphetamines in the debates, and knowledgeable former
cocaine users said definitely cocaine)--or being fed them by someone else.
I don't find the latter at all impossible, and I would point the finger
directly at Steve Bannon, who I think is the evil eminence behind this
entire presidency.

That's my theory, and I'm sticking to it.

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 9:21 AM, <sally.davies at gmail.com> wrote:

> Exactly Mike - making sweeping generalizations would not achieve this, but
> a carefully built, specific and objective description might reach some of
> them.
>
> It does appear from what I read that a great many people have concluded
> precisely that - hence the rising unfavourabilitiy ratings and so forth -
> but even if there were some way to get rid of him, the puppet masters are
> still in place.
>
> The sheer volume and force of the assault on democracy must be making it
> difficult for a resistance movement to organise, but there are plenty of
> hopeful signs. As in SA, you only know how healthy your democracy really is
> when people start to stand up and fight for it at grassroots level.
>
> Sally D
>
>
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 at 4:13 PM Mahoney, W. Michael <wmmah at stoneledge.net>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Charles Wohlers <
> > charles.wohlers at verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Personally, I prefer stark raving bonkers.    ;-)
> >
> >
> > The important issue is not how nuts he is but how to persuade his
> > supporters that they are making a mistake.
> >
> > Mike M
> >
>