[Magdalen] No mail

[Kate Conant]

I was inspired by Greenpeace today:

APTOPIX_Protest_Crane_27137.jpg-c26e8.jpg
<https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/Wires/Online/2017-01-25/AP/Images/APTOPIX_Protest_Crane_27137.jpg-c26e8.jpg?uuid=zp9w_OMwEeakGe7-jv8INQ>

"What does the Lord require of you, but to do justice, love mercy, and walk
humbly with your God?"
Micah 6:8

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Kristin Rollins <kristin at verumsolum.com>
wrote:

> That makes the very large assumption that an honest investigation is
> what he intends. Given the number of easily disproved falsehoods over
> the last six days (not to mention the transition or the campaign), I am
> not sure that assumption is warranted in this case.
>
>
> --
>
> Kristin Rollins
>
> kristin at verumsolum.com
>
> Portsmouth, VA
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017, at 06:53 PM, Roger Stokes wrote:
>
> > On 25/01/2017 17:52, M J _Mike_ Logsdon wrote:
>
> > >>>> all liars.  So is Hillary and her gang.<<<
>
> > > All campaigns are imperfect, and deception is part of public life
> > > sometimes, unfortunately.  But in this case, surely, magnitude of
> > > offense must play a part.  I didn't initially want Hillary, only
> > > because I was irritated to no end that the GOPers had 17 numbskulls
> > > and we had only 5?  And one of them a cartoon character?  But once
> > > it came down to T vs C, ... you all know my story.
> > >
>
> > > As is so often explained on MSNBC these days (not a biased network,
> > > in my opinion, due to the obvious presence of Republicans as staff,
> > > contributors, and guests), "lie" involves the deliberate intention
> > > to deceive.  Hillary and her camp do NOT fit that definition, at
> > > all.  "Period!", as Trump would say.
> >
>
> > There are various sites that compare politicians' claims with
> > the facts.
> > During the campaign these consistently showed that Trump's
>
> > misrepresentations were more numerous and more blatant than were
>
> > Clinton's. I also expect the widely announced investigation
> > into alleged
> > voter fraud to sink without trace as an honest investigation would not
> > show the results the President wants. Yes, he cited a survey
> > that showed
> > 1.8 million dead citizens were still on the rolls a few years back.
>
> > Never mind the fact that's a million less than he lost by in
> > the popular
> > vote so even if they had all been cast fraudulently for Hillary
> > he would
> > still have lost the popular vote. The reality is that these
> > would mostly
> > be elderly people and of their vote had been used then it is likely it
> > would have been by another elderly person - who would probably
> > have used
> > it to vote for Trump. Calling for this investigation was not a
> > wise move.
> >
>
> > Roger
>
>
>