[Magdalen] No mail

[Kristin Rollins]

That makes the very large assumption that an honest investigation is
what he intends. Given the number of easily disproved falsehoods over
the last six days (not to mention the transition or the campaign), I am
not sure that assumption is warranted in this case.


--

Kristin Rollins

kristin at verumsolum.com

Portsmouth, VA





On Wed, Jan 25, 2017, at 06:53 PM, Roger Stokes wrote:

> On 25/01/2017 17:52, M J _Mike_ Logsdon wrote:

> >>>> all liars.  So is Hillary and her gang.<<<

> > All campaigns are imperfect, and deception is part of public life
> > sometimes, unfortunately.  But in this case, surely, magnitude of
> > offense must play a part.  I didn't initially want Hillary, only
> > because I was irritated to no end that the GOPers had 17 numbskulls
> > and we had only 5?  And one of them a cartoon character?  But once
> > it came down to T vs C, ... you all know my story.
> >

> > As is so often explained on MSNBC these days (not a biased network,
> > in my opinion, due to the obvious presence of Republicans as staff,
> > contributors, and guests), "lie" involves the deliberate intention
> > to deceive.  Hillary and her camp do NOT fit that definition, at
> > all.  "Period!", as Trump would say.
>

> There are various sites that compare politicians' claims with
> the facts.
> During the campaign these consistently showed that Trump's

> misrepresentations were more numerous and more blatant than were

> Clinton's. I also expect the widely announced investigation
> into alleged
> voter fraud to sink without trace as an honest investigation would not
> show the results the President wants. Yes, he cited a survey
> that showed
> 1.8 million dead citizens were still on the rolls a few years back.

> Never mind the fact that's a million less than he lost by in
> the popular
> vote so even if they had all been cast fraudulently for Hillary
> he would
> still have lost the popular vote. The reality is that these
> would mostly
> be elderly people and of their vote had been used then it is likely it
> would have been by another elderly person - who would probably
> have used
> it to vote for Trump. Calling for this investigation was not a
> wise move.
>

> Roger