[Magdalen] Hypocrisy?

[Don Boyd]

Chad, I would like to believe that the term “politician” is not yet synonymous with “dishonorable” or “Machiavellian “, but there remain (sadly in diminishing numbers) some honorable and decent professional politicians.  That said, I do believe that Sen. McConnell  stands a good chance of replacing Sen. Joe McCarthy  in opprobrium.

Sent from my iPad

> On Sep 19, 2020, at 3:07 PM, Chad Wohlers <chad at satucket.com> wrote:
> 
> You have to understand that Mitch McConnell is a politician, first, last, and always. Nothing at all matters - not hypocrisy, ethics, morality, whatever - as long as it advances his cause (the Republican Party). He is a complete Machiavellian.
> 
> -- 
> Chad Wohlers
> chad at satucket.com
> Woodbury, VT   USA
> 
> 
>> On 9/19/2020 9:39 AM, Roger Stokes via Magdalen wrote:
>> An earlier attempt to send the bulk of this was blocked by the system's spam filter (no quibble about that, Brian) so here's another attempt.
>> 
>> It is being reported that Mitch McConnell as saying that the Senate will move forward quickly on confirming President Trump's nominee of a successor to Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. I would like to think that this really is "fake news" but is all too plausible. In March 2016 this same Leader of the Senate said it was too close to a Presidential Election to proceed with President Obama's nomination following Antonin Scalia's death. Does he really have the gall and bad taste to do this six month's closer to the election? If he does then he certainly does not deserve to be in his present position given Christ's condemnation of hypocrisy? It would be even worse if he did so if he sought Senate confirmation of such a nomination if, as the polls indicate, the Democrats achieve a majority of the popular vote.
>> 
>> Roger
>> 
>>