[Magdalen] Don't know if this is already widely known ...

[James Oppenheimer-Crawford]

Well, the man certainly puts it out there -- and makes a lot of sense.

The question is whether or not there is a legal means to thwart the monster.

I can only hope that people bear in mind that any effort to remove any
President-elect from office has to simultaneously also deal with his
designated replacement, as the Veep appears to be just about as unsuitable.



James W. Oppenheimer-Crawford
*“A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved,
except in memory. LLAP**”  -- *Leonard Nimoy

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Roger Stokes <roger.stokes65 at btinternet.com
> wrote:

> On 20/11/2016 14:58, Lynn Ronkainen wrote:
>
>> As I'm sure you're aware Roger these two ballots, yours and ours have
>> been widely compared to each other with the concepts of voter remorse and
>> unsatisfactory final outcome. The "interesting times" have arrived - those
>> so long bandied about as aphorism
>>
> Lynn,
>
> I am indeed aware of the comparison. They were protests against the
> current situation but were not for a coherent (and achievable) new desired
> order. As a result (following misrepresentation before the referendum) we
> are now faced with disagreement on what the government should be seeking as
> a divorce settlement from the EU. You have a President-designate (not elect
> until after the electors have cast their votes on 19 December) whose
> policies are unclear. Meanwhile we have a critique from Lord Williams of
> Oystermouth, aka The Rt Revd and Rt Hon Rowan Williams.
> http://www.newstatesman.com/world/2016/11/mass-democracy-has
> -failed-its-time-seek-humane-alternative
>
> Roger
>