[Magdalen] Da Debate.

Lynn Ronkainen houstonklr at gmail.com
Tue Sep 27 19:58:34 UTC 2016


Anderson ran when Regan was elected and Perot ran when Clinton was elected. 
(And Regan challenged Gerald Ford the sitting appointed VP turned Prez  when Ford secured the nomination and then Carter was elected...) Seems like it's been "always something" for the Democrats that *won* in my voting lifetime. I voted for both Anderson and Perot hoping at those times to affirm 3rd party candidacies. I'm wiser than that now. 
Lynn 



www.ichthysdesigns.com

When I stand before God at the end of my life, I would hope that I would not have a single bit of talent left, and could say, 'I used everything you gave me'. attributed to Erma Bombeck


On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Jay Weigel <jay.weigel at gmail.com> wrote:

Or whatever year it was that John Anderson ran. My late ex voted for him,
and I was tempted.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:07 PM, M J _Mike_ Logsdon <mjl at ix.netcom.com>
wrote:

>>>> I agree that Clinton "won" the debate but it won't make a lot of
> difference.  Neither tried to woo 3rd party voters, something Clinton
> really needs to do.<<<
> 
> The 3rd party voters may not budge, though.  Making for a 1992 all over
> again.  Sort of.
> 
> Just wanting it all over.
> 


More information about the Magdalen mailing list