[Magdalen] Da Debate.

[Grace Cangialosi]

I know they did, but I was under the impression that, had Nader not run, George W and Gore would not have tied--Gore would have won outright.

> On Sep 27, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Lynn Ronkainen <houstonklr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Grace-I remember that. When did Nader run--wasn't he the reason we ended up with George W? 
> 
> Nader ran often, more like a nipping at the heels puppy than damaging. It was The Supremes that installed G W.  
> L
> 
> 
> 
> www.ichthysdesigns.com
> 
> When I stand before God at the end of my life, I would hope that I would not have a single bit of talent left, and could say, 'I used everything you gave me'. attributed to Erma Bombeck
> 
> 
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Grace Cangialosi <gracecan at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I remember that. When did Nader run--wasn't he the reason we ended up with George W?
> 
>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Jay Weigel <jay.weigel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Or whatever year it was that John Anderson ran. My late ex voted for him,
>> and I was tempted.
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:07 PM, M J _Mike_ Logsdon <mjl at ix.netcom.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> I agree that Clinton "won" the debate but it won't make a lot of
>>> difference.  Neither tried to woo 3rd party voters, something Clinton
>>> really needs to do.<<<
>>> 
>>> The 3rd party voters may not budge, though.  Making for a 1992 all over
>>> again.  Sort of.
>>> 
>>> Just wanting it all over.
>>>